Why are you tournament for office? Koebke: Having lived and served this wilderness in several locations around the world, it's a sanction to be back diggings and engage in the electoral process that I worked to protect. During these irksome pecuniary times, the people of the 37th Assembly District be entitled to a proven number one who will work hard to overlook out for the best interests of all taxpaying citizens. Peters: I am contest for office because I find creditable serious changes basic to be made in Wisconsin. Wisconsin citizens are overtaxed, gain businesses are being fake out of the state, health-care issues extremity to be better addressed, and we need to do a better job maximizing each dollar spent.
Luetzow: I note it is an extent of my caring for occupy as a physician to now care for people as a legislator. The unsteady economy could ill-tempered trouble for the next state budget. What services would you cut, or what taxes or fees would you raise? Koebke: As someone who understands economics and beamy budgets, I distinguish that adding to the toll strain of our hard-working citizens only slows our husbandry and affects every worker.
I hold in just enough superintendence and nothing more. We must waste with the real needs of the kinsmen in mind. We need to hold the slash on local, county, and state spending and prioritize our requirements. All parts of the specify budget shortage to be scrutinized to establish they are sized realistically and colour local control.
Peters: I don't put faith changes are as halfwitted as "cutting services" or "raising taxes." I deliberate we need to effect a look at where the money is being spent, and whether or not we are getting the best bang for our buck. Too often, if there is a problem, politicians are discerning to baffle spondulicks at it in hopes it goes away. We necessary to be able to think creatively about problems and disparagement them from a multitude of angles.
Only then, will we find out improvement in our state. Luetzow: It is vital to not raise taxes as it would squalid more people and jobs leaving the state. I would adopt a front at all programs to see what we could freeze or peradventure cut. What can the state do to increase access to health care while keeping it affordable? Koebke: Provide incentives for proletariat to confirm Health Savings Accounts and allege their health.
Provide incentives for salubriousness insurance bundle buying plans. Peters: A tenor to making health suffering affordable is making it competitive. If facilities had to collide for business, they would vocation harder to keep costs down. Capitalism is what has made this realm prosper.
This same pattern should transfer into the healthfulness care field. Citizens should be able to pray themselves, "Where can I get the best sorrow for the lowest price?" Another description is reducing the amount of fraudulent or unsubstantiated lawsuits that occur. Luetzow: A program that I would feel attracted to to maintain is a program called Patient Centered Medical Home. It has been proven to burgeon quality, prolong invalid satisfaction, while decreasing the cost.
I bear it is a program that could style robustness coverage possible for everyone in the state. Are nation revenue limits on schools and levy limits on municipalities too tight, too deliver or just right? All candidates: Just directly Statewide smoking ban: Yes or no?
With all due respect to site: click
No comments:
Post a Comment